• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

WorkingManLaw Blog

Current news & tips for navigating workers' comp, workplace safety and personal injury law

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact

Why the BGF Industries Lawsuit for Workers’ Comp Was Denied

June 21, 2021

BGF Industries lawsuit

Vickie Rummage was a textile worker in South Carolina, working as a weaver. While at work, she stumbled backward. It would seem to be a textbook case of an injury that qualifies for workers’ compensation.

But this was no textbook case.

An injury that occurred in 2012 finally finished its journey through the court system in early 2021. Rummage’s appeal for workers’ comp against her employer, BGF Industries, was denied.

Here’s a timeline of the BGF Industries lawsuit:

  • In May 2012, while working the third shift at 3 a.m., Rummage fell backward into a hand truck behind her. She suffered lacerations and scrape marks. However, she declined to go to the hospital and had the wound sealed up with glue. Rummage finished her shift.
  • Rummage worked for a week, but began to complain of blurred vision and headaches. She was sent for a CT scan that showed normal results, although the case records show the treating physician suspected “some element of concussion.” A follow-up appointment in June 2012 didn’t reveal new information.
  • The headaches continued and Rummage went to a different doctor where she allowed that she had a history of migraine headaches. Rummage suffered from nausea, blurred vision, leg spasms and mood swings. The doctor noted her symptoms were consistent with what he described as a “closed-head injury.”
  • In December 2012, a third doctor evaluated Rummage. Over the next 3 years, she was treated for mental impairments, physical therapy, neck pain and depression.

Over the course of legal discovery, it was found out that Rummage had received treatment for these conditions before her workplace injury. She was responsible for caring for a husband and adult son who both had health problems, along with 2 parents at the end of their lives. Rummage was working multiple jobs. The doctor’s notes from this period indicated concern over how long her body and mind would be able to keep up.

This prior medical history is what would prove decisive to both the workers’ comp commissioners, who initially denied her claim for benefits and later in the appeals court in South Carolina. The appeals court said, “The Claimant’s injury was not the kind that should have caused the problems she was suffering from.”

The sad story holds many lessons within. The first is the hard truth that the workers’ compensation system was designed to focus on a very narrow window of justice dealing strictly with workplace injuries. It’s possible Rummage was simply seeking help from the wrong source.

The second is that the chances of proving the injuries were related to the May 2012 fall were drastically reduced when Rummage didn’t go to the hospital. Medical treatment and legal counsel were delayed. The end result was 9 years of court battles that ultimately went nowhere.

Related Posts

  • Can I Be Fired in North Carolina for Filing for Workers' Comp?
    Can I Be Fired in North Carolina for Filing for Workers'…
  • How States Are Responding to Workers’ Compensation Claims from Essential Employees
    How States Are Responding to Workers’ Compensation Claims…
  • New Jersey Postal Employee Pleads Guilty to Workers’ Comp Fraud
    New Jersey Postal Employee Pleads Guilty to Workers’ Comp…

Filed Under: Workplace Safety Tagged With: workers compensation

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Car Accidents
  • Employment Law
  • Estate Planning
  • Immigration Law
  • Personal Injury
  • Workers' Compensation and Injury Info
  • Workplace Safety

Browse Our Lawyer Directory

  • Workers' Comp Directory
  • Commercial Law Resources
  • Personal Injury Resources
  • Workers' Compensation Brokerages
  • Workers' Compensation Insurance
  • Workplace Safety Services

Workers’ Compensation Attorney Profile

Meet Colorado Workers' Compensation, Personal Injury and Insurance Dispute Attorney R. Mack Babcock

Prior to founding The Babcock Law Firm, LLC, R. Mack Babcock spent many years on the other side of workers' compensation, car accidents, personal injury and insurance disputes representing some of the largest insurance companies and corporations in Colorado as an attorney at a midsize insurance defense firm.

Babcock is a member of the Colorado and Denver Bar Associations, the Colorado Trial Lawyers Association and the Workers' Compensation Educational Association. In early 2008, he was elected as the Colorado House District 43 Committee Chairperson for the Douglas County Colorado Democratic Party. In connection with this position, he is responsible for finding a candidate(s) to run for House District 43, overseeing the campaign(s), organizing volunteers, and also sits on the executive committee for the Douglas County Democratic Party.

Footer

Copyright © 2022. Working Man Law.

Lawyer directory developed by web designers for attorney web sites at SEOLegal.com: attorney online marketing services.
Online Guide: Workers Compensation : Personal Injury : Workplace Safety : Consumer Safety